[Futuregen] Qual study inputs ahead of next zoom and agenda for 29.4

Tue Apr 28 10:03:58 CEST 2020

Dear Janet, dear all,

Many thanks for providing this draft - I have made a few comments and 
suggestions directly in the text but I think the list of questions is 
very good already. I'm a bit worried about the number of questions - at 
a quick count, there will be less than 2 minutes per question/ follow-up 
question if you want to stick to the 45 minutes limit. That seems to me 
insufficient but you would know better.

Looking forward to discussing this, Stefania

On 28-Apr-20 9:31 AM, rodrigues at euro.centre.org wrote:
> Dear Janet et al,
>
> Thank you very much for sending this well in time for our zoom.
> I will read it carefully.
>
> I already sent some comments on the questions Selma circulated for 
> WP2, but Stefania will follow up still today on this, so that we can 
> have those in time for the zoom.
> Your "agenda" for discussion looks good too and we will take them all 
> onboard on Wed.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Best wishes,
> Ricardo
>
> On 2020-04-27 14:00, Janet Jull wrote:
>> Hi Ricardo and Team,
>>
>>  Attached is the draft of the questions for our meeting later this
>> week.
>>
>>  Ricardo, I realize that you and the team are sorting out some details
>> so there are questons we developed as a placeholder in your section.
>> When there are updates from your group then you can send out a revised
>> version of this document ahead of our meeting. It is early here but
>> getting later in the day elsewhere and I realize that you were
>> concerned that everyone have the document in time.
>>
>>  We (Erika, Selma, myself) have had some good discussions and have
>> moved things along together and within our teams in the past few
>> weeks. We have a pretty solid plan for the qualitative study and would
>> like to discuss a few things with the team in our meeting:
>>
>>  1) Thoughts on the question set: Do they now reflect the WP
>> findings/interests, and seem to be a coherent whole (see attached
>> document, begins on p5).
>>  2) Updates: next steps with the question set.
>>  3) Discussion: the potential role of the SB with the qualitative
>> study.
>>  4) Qualitative study conduct going forward: details on the study,
>> people, plans for publication(s).
>>
>>  Talk with you all soon!
>>
>>  Best wishes,
>>  Janet
>>
>>  Janet Jull, OT Reg (Ont), PhD
>>
>>  Assistant Professor, School of Rehabilitation Therapy,
>>  Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
>>  janet.jull at queensu.ca
>>
>>  Doctor of Science in Rehabilitation and Health Leadership (DSc RHL)
>>
>>  https://rehab.queensu.ca/academic-programs/dsc [1]
>>
>>  Affiliate Investigator, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
>>
>>  Ottawa, Ontario
>>
>>  Queen's University is situated on traditional Anishinaabe and
>> Haudenosaunee Territory.
>>
>> -------------------------
>>
>> From: Futuregen <futuregen-bounces at euro.centre.org> on behalf of
>> rodrigues at euro.centre.org <rodrigues at euro.centre.org>
>> Sent: April 23, 2020 2:33 AM
>> To: futuregen at euro.centre.org <futuregen at euro.centre.org>
>> Subject: [Futuregen] Qual study inputs ahead of next zoom and agenda
>> for 29.4
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Ahead of our next zoom, here is some information that we would require
>>
>> ahead of the next zoom, as well as a proposed agenda and a few points
>> still regarding the SB meeting at the end.
>>
>> Janet and Selma, our next zoom will focus very much on the qualitative
>>
>> study.
>> Please send us by the end of the day of the 27.4 a complete and final
>> document describing the qualitative study, with the necessary sections
>>
>> ready for ethics submission. This includes also the questions/prompts
>> you would like to ask interviewees or/and supporting material you want
>>
>> to share with interviewees (if that is the case).
>> As Susan suggested, please leave the track changes out.
>> Feel free to reach out to WPs if you require any input or
>> clarification.
>> As we did for the other WP presentations for the SB, please think of
>> what you would like to get from the SB and how you plan to engage them
>>
>> in the meeting, so that we can discuss that as well.
>>
>> As for the next meeting,
>> Agenda for zoom:
>> 13h30-14h45: qualitative study discussion, including the qual study
>> session in the SB
>> 14h45-15h30: pending questions regarding the SB meeting from previous
>> zoom
>>
>> Regarding the pending questions stated above, I'm just waiting for the
>>
>> minutes to be completed so that we can detail them.
>>
>> There are two issues that came to my mind regarding the SB as I was
>> preparing the agenda and that I share with you in advance:
>> i) COVID: this is actually likely to come up early on, so it might be
>> useful to make just passing reference to this in the opening (that
>> this
>> is also one issue we will discuss in the context of each WP, if deem
>> relevant by SB members). I also added 10 more minutes to this session
>> -
>> shortened the lunch break to 1h - as there are always questions
>> arising
>> at the introduction and we will have one or two "new" SB members
>> attending and we should allow them to introduce themselves.
>> See doc attached (still waiting for some inputs, so it's not final).
>>
>> ii) It just occurred to me that we are quite "past"-oriented in our SB
>>
>> meeting: we ask comments mostly about what we did.
>> We will discuss the future in the last session but that might not be
>> enough.
>> Without wanting to overload an already very dense program, maybe we
>> can
>> add a slide at the end of each WP presentation with the next
>> steps/tasks.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Ricardo
>>
>> -- 
>> Ricardo Rodrigues, PhD, MSc
>> Deputy Director
>> Head of Health and Care Unit
>> European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research
>> Berggasse 17,
>> 1090 Vienna, Austria
>> Tel. 0043-(1)319-4505-35
>> https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.euro.centre.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjanet.jull%40queensu.ca%7Cf9382a89a21c4bd60b7a08d7e75052fb%7Cd61ecb3b38b142d582c4efb2838b925c%7C1%7C0%7C637232204635843682&sdata=ynaPGQrCF3seeN3NoLKVdmYaNSgLoJeL%2BEej6jTnpAU%3D&reserved=0 
>>
>> Follow us on Twitter! @EuroCentre_SWPR
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] https://rehab.queensu.ca/academic-programs/dsc
>

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Qualitative Protocol Question List from April 27 draft _SIcomm.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 44551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.euro.centre.org/pipermail/futuregen/attachments/20200428/181d7e60/attachment-0001.docx>