[Futuregen] Fwd: Re: SB Meeting date in May

[rodrigues at euro.centre.org]

Dear all,

I'm re-sending the e-mail where we discussed what we would present at 
the SB meeting in May, with the additions from Stefan and Susan in the 
text below.
This will be useful today to check where we stand. Please reply to this 
e-mail if I forgot anything.

Best wishes,
Ricardo

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Futuregen] SB Meeting date in May
Date: 2020-01-16 08:36
 From: rodrigues at euro.centre.org
To: futuregen at euro.centre.org

Dear all,

We are still some time from the SB meeting but I would like us to start 
thinking about it and what we would want to present and have inputs from 
the SB. This also gives us a very good “to do” list till the SB.

Here is a first step for this with some ideas. I would ask you to 
comment on these and/or propose changes please. Please bear in mind that 
for WPs 1 and 3 these are merely suggestions.

Data Navigator: to have the pilot ready, which will consist of graphic 
information trends per gender and SEC for two “outcome” variables: ADLs 
and formal care use. For formal care use we might also include a cohort 
graph.

WP1: to present and have feedback on the first results of the cohort 
analysis for ADLs/IADLs [This could be more interesting and more 
relevant for feedback from SB members than the review – just a 
suggestion].
Stefan added:  From WP1, I would probably like to share some preliminary 
results from the scoping review as well - more as a part of the 
background, than as a point of discussion - as the results suggest great 
plasticity both in the magnitude of the sex differences in disabilities 
and in the role played by socioeconomics in explaining the observed sex 
differences.

WP2: to present the results of the analysis on marital status/living 
arrangements and the effects on care use.

WP3: to present the results of the review on methods – the challenge 
here might be to entice a discussion from a heterogenous group of people 
with different backgrounds on methods. Ideas?
Susan added: I think the WP3 group could do a very brief presentation of 
methods, highlighting why this matters along with results. We may also 
be able to present a testing of the various methods using CLSA data 
which would give results the SB could use to grab hold of to think about 
and give us advice on policy implications. Please time our part to 
coincide with when Andreas Zooms in.

WP3: to present to SB the qualitative study (scope, sample and 
questions) for possible feedback on how to improve it – NOTE: we will 
likely have the qualitative study already submitted to Ethics at that 
stage, as discussed during the last zoom.


We could take this further in the next zoom, but I would really like us 
to advance already via e-mail, so please feel free to react to the 
above.
Looking forward to your replies!

Best wishes,
Ricardo

-- 
Ricardo Rodrigues, PhD, MSc
Deputy Director
Head of Health and Care Unit
European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research
Berggasse 17,
1090 Vienna, Austria
Tel. 0043-(1)319-4505-35
www.euro.centre.org
Follow us on Twitter! @EuroCentre_SWPR